Some 75 professors in the US have declared that they see an “inside” hand in the WTC blasts of 9/11.
What does come to the mind immediately is that the Bushes, father and son have proven financial and economic links with the Saudi royals who fund terrorism worldwide as well. Even Osama has a Saudi royal connection.
Although he has been declared personal non-grata by the Saudi royals, the rest of his family has not. So it would prove truly ironical if it is established that the Saudi royals funded the WTC plane crashes as well as the bombs placed inside the towers in collusion with their bush ally on one hand and Osama on the other.
Would that prove a bush-Osama link, which would explain why bush talks so much about him but does not actually kill or capture him? Truly ironical. What says?