Need for further Mastani research
Mastani was reputedly stunningly beautiful:
Had Mastani been such a stunning beauty, there would
have been some genuine picture or painting of her. The two in the Kelkar and
Wai museums have been denounced by historians as not depictions of Mastani
herself. There are too many identification and cultural errors for these to be
depictions of Mastani.
The innumerable anomalies in the story of Mastani as
it is popularly told, stick out. Here was a Kshtriya maiden, daughter of the
most powerful ruler of Central India of his times and a known upholder of his
religion, supposedly "giving" his daughter from a minor
"wife/mistress" to the Peshwa. If she was the daughter of a mistress,
would not that be a calculated insult to the man who saved Chhatrasaal life and
kingdom for him?
To assuage which Chhatrasaal agreed to give the Peshwa
one third of his kingdom as well as war reparations of 2.25 lakhs? Against
these reparations, Mastani's lugda choli, i.e. dowry alone was five lakhs!
When Mastani first arrived with Baji Rao, she was
accepted in his Brahmin household. Despite having been brought up in the
Pranami Panth, with its unique combination of rituals and customs, she was able
to adjust in the Brahmin household surprisingly well. When Baji Rao built his
Shaniwar Wada, there is a corner reserved for Mastani as Mastani Mahal the
northeastern one!
During her pregnancy, she lived under the same roof as
Baji Rao's mother, Radhabai and his first wife, Kashibai. So much so that when
Mastani entered her final trimester and was big with child, Baji Rao slept with
Kashibai, leaving her pregnant too. Both his wives delivered sons within months
of each other in 1734.
Yes, I did say "wife". For the present day
descendants of the Peshwas are on record acknowledging Mastani as the legally
wedded (or whatever term may have been prevalent in that society in the 1730s)
second wife of Peshwa Baji Rao I. Is it not significant that neither the king,
Shahu Maharaj, nor Baji Rao's spiritual guru, Brahmendra Swami made any public
denouncement of Mastani, which would have well been the case had she been the manipulative
mistress that she was made out to be.
The social history of those times reveals that it was
the return of Shahu from Mughal imprisonment that saw the introduction of many
North Indian influences into Maratha social life. These included various
festivals and Rajput practices, including dancing girls, wine and meat
consumption; for all of which Mastani was blamed. Was it a parochial bias
against a highly accomplished princess from Central India versus the rather
simpler women of the Bhat Peshwa household?
Whatever be the case, records indicate that after Baji
Rao escorted Kashibai on her Narmada yatra, it was the turn of his mother
Radhabai to embark on her Varanasi yatra. On her way there, Rajput princes and
rajas feted her. On her way back she made a stopover at Bundelkhand.
Question: Did she stay at Mastani's maika or with
Govind Pant Bundela who was Baji Rao's agent there to collect his dues from the
estate he inherited from Chhatrasaal?
What happened during that stopover that as soon as
Radhabai returned to Pune, she embarked on a pogrom of vilification against
Mastani and drew support from the Chitpavan Brahmins, citing the Mussalmani,
wine and meat issue etc.?
This vilification campaign was eventually to sap Baji
Rao; so much so that for the first time in his life, he ran a fever so high
that it took his life!! Was that actually so for the famed cavalry general who
had led his troops in numerous battles and never been ill a day?
And in the bargain, Mastani's also, although no
historical records have been left of how, when and where she actually died.
Should this myth be accepted or probed since it came
on the heels of Baji Rao's announcement to his ambitious brother Chimaji that
he was considering shifting out of Pune and settling down with Mastani, closer
to Delhi and his Bundelkhand estates.
If anyone can tell me anything that will throw light
on these questions, I will be very obliged.
Comments