Tipu Sultan and Chitpavan Jews?
Dec. 2015 saw most of India agog over a lavishly set movie,
in which a princess storms into the headquarters of an ally and into his heart
-- at a time when she and her bhabhi were actually storming the enemy camp to
rescue her imprisoned brother. That did
not count.
The evil Sasu relegates the princess to a kotha. The
first wife delivers her son at her maika. When she brings him home, hero goes
off to personally deliver his princess’ son.
Another historical mixup: Mastani’s son was born in
January 1734 and Kashibai’s in August 1734, both under personal supervision of
the Peshwa’s mother Radhabai.
The princess earns the ire of her saut, the Peshwa’s brother
and their compatriot Chitpavan Brahmins, all rooting for his first wife.
Now the Chitpavan Brahmins have a curious history: Virtual anonymity until Balaji Vishwanath (Baji
Rao’s father) left the Konkan and made his way into royal service. Once he was
appointed Peshwa, his fellow Chitpavans flocked to Pune and its surroundings,
taking up lucrative jobs and airs to go with them.
There is this old legend that Chitpavan means purified
with fire i.e. they were washed ashore in a storm and were being cremated, but
rose as if from death and were “chitpavan.”
Another that Parshuram pushed
back the sea to create a strip of land which was gifted to those
survivors. Accepted for generations as
the base for their superior airs, handsome unusual looks, large noses, tall
foreheads, blue or grey eyes, lean frame and scholarly attitudes.
Recent research endorses the shipwrecked story; but also links
the survivors’ descendants’ matching genes to the Mediterranean peoples, perhaps
Jews? Plausible, as trading links are truly ancient.
These nuggets emerged in 25 years of dedicated research
before writing what is now acknowledged as a biography of the real Mastani,
neither muslim nor dancing girl, but intelligence officer and princess par
excellence.
Research needs perseverance and an affinity for the
object and for digging out history from sources other than those written by the
victors to suit their purposes. Two
recent examples:
Utkarsh Patel’s presentation of Shakuntala, not as the
romantic weeping willow made popular by Kalidas’s poem; but as a strong willed
woman with the guts to tick off the king in open court, as depicted in the
original story in Vyas’ original Mahabharat.
Perhaps the most serious contender prized looking at history
through new prisms based on research is
Dr. Bhagwandas Gidwani, mentioned last week for his monumental, “The Return of
the Aryans.” His book “The Sword of TIpu
Sultan” had inspired my Mastani research.
Gidwani’s book
debunks the communal Tipu Sultan of the “mindless little men of the future
who call themselves historians...".
Instead tutored by a mullah, a pandit and a Brahmin prime minister, Tipu
vacillates between Fakir, Patriot and King, as the only bulwark against
the English, other than Brahmin-led Marathas; instead of Rajput Rajahs with
their infighting history that let India down at every invasion since Time
Immemorial.
Comments