A WOMAN NAMED SITARAM?
Ever heard of a woman called Radhakrishna, Radheshyam or
Sitaram? The names sound feminine
enough.
Why does one only hear of men carrying those names? Legend has it that they were a "vardaan" to Sita and Radha: that their names would always precede their
men’s because their steadfast loyalty and love placed them above everyone,
including Ram and Krishna.
Krishna dallied with dozens and married two; a married Radha
defied home, family and society, steadfast in her love for her Lord.
In banwas, in Lanka, with the agnipariksha and ever
after, Sita’s caliber was way above Ram’s raghukul niti against whom question
marks still stand for those controversial later days and apparent lust for throne.
Despite that, no girls are ever named Sitaram, Radheshyam;
only plain Sita, Radha or Krishna. Boys
get the double appellation, even triple with Shivaramakrishna.
The issue here is the usurpation. Why are Men so mortally
afraid -- of being outdone or exposed by their Women? To even snatch away god’s
vardaan?
From the beginnings of Time, "Jab se Insaan ne
dharti par hosh sambhala….", the female of the species was found to be the
Life giver, the Nurturer. Religions started with female deities, all over
ancient civilizations. Hence the personification
of Earth, Nature and life giving Rivers etc. as female deities and evolution of
the matrilineal communities.
At some
juncture, perhaps a crisis while the woman was in childbirth, the Man used brute
physical force to take over to meet the crisis.
And the taste of power remained forever more, by sheer physical power
and manipulation, physical, emotional and mental.
The Occident loves to believe in powerful Cavemen. What
proof is there that the Cave Woman did not accompany the Cave Man on his
hunting expeditions? Avataar did seem
to show that. Or that Cave Man actually slung Cave Woman over his shoulder to
cut short the wooing process? Except the
frivolity of some Western writers: brute force always carries the day.
In the Orient, goddesses still hold sway over most of
India in tandem with gods, long after Christianity chased female deities into
oblivion.
In India, powerful Goddesses are the norm, with male and
female devotees; although that is not replicated within families.
With Islam came the desi answer to the purdah system,
with the ghunghat, which was alien to the carvings of Mohenjadaro and Khajuraho
both; started in the part of India where the kings bought peace by marrying
their bahens and betis to Mughals.
A recent step: aping
the uniformity of organized religion in Islam and Christianity with dictats
that everyone must do this or say that or sing it. Tie themselves up in knots
on what women should wear, what they should not do etc. Why don’t all men, including pracharaks go back to old styled dhotis? While suspect ‘religious’ leaders reap souls and
prime reap real estate.
Back to Radha and Sita: both fought their own battles and
won adherents over centuries. And
neither is shown in a ghunghat.
Comments