Deepika Vs Madhuri
The music channels are full of the “Deewani Mastani” song. It takes one back Madhuri
Dixit’s so many kg ghagra kothawali dance in Devdas. Pet obsession?
Chitpavan women would never be caught in
public watching such a performance, as Priyanka Chopra is seen, with perhaps
the most authentic expressions crossing her face as she looks on at the
interplay between Ranveer Singh and Deepika Padukone.
Deepika, in her pale gold avatar in a net outfit
reminiscent of flamenco dancers, with many co-dancers, seems to inhabit the same Madhuri space. She dances in a huge ornate
space, more European than Peshwai in design.
Peshwai architecture was noted for its
long, perhaps narrow halls and tall distinctively fluted and carved wooden columns
based on stone to prevent damp and
insect damage --- all topped with intricately carved wood ceilings and all polished
black in color. Noted examples are the Mastani
resurrected palace at the world renowned Kelkar Museum in Pune and the Wada of
Nana Fadnis at Wai.
Yes, the setting has a beauty of its
own. But the historical references?
Despite considerable ‘authenticity’assurances
from the production company, Mastani is apparently being depicted as a dancing
girl – from Persia!! or Spain? It sticks to an old
myth of a courtesan, not Baji Rao's legally
married second wife. The marriage is accepted by the present day Peshwa family
and Kashibai’s descendants, after later day research brought out the facts of
Mastani's origins.
Mastani was a kshtriya princess from
Bundelkhand, a daughter of one of the
noted kings of his time and the chief proponent of the Pranami Panth. Maharaj Chhatrasaal gave her a dowry 5 lakhs lugda choli with 500
gold mohurs, plus a jagir of one third of his estate to Bajirao plus one third
share in the mines of diamonds and emeralds at Panna.
Such a handsome dowry for a dancing
girl? When all that he sent to Maharajswami Shahu as war reparations for
Bajirao's rescue mission was a sum of 1.25 lakhs?
Yes, Mastani used to dance … in her
Krishna bhakti (hence the name Mastani.)
and for her husband Baji Rao. The only time she danced for the family
was when she had performed at the Janmasthami that Kashibai organized in their
apartments. Baji Rao's secretary came in to get signatures, saw her dance
and spoke about it, germinating that myth. The other time she directed the little girls of the family
for a dance at Ganesh utsav.
At the Kelkar museum recreation of her
palace chamber, a prominent display is that of her tanpura and her Bal Krishna.
Would such a devout princess stand up in
public to sing main deewani mastani hogayi etc etc. no dignity or class?
The book on which the film is purportedly
based, was first written in the 1970s before any research had happened. The author
went by the prevailing myths of the time. Those dancing girl myths were
created at the instance of Kashibai's grandson and Raghunath Rao's son, later
known as Baji Rao II who lost the Peshwai to the British. He was trying
to ensure he got the Peshwai and not Mastani’s grandson, Ali Bahadur who was favored
because he was the replica of Baji Rao I both physically but also
administratively and emotionally and therefore popular. Ali Bahadur was
later sent off as the Nawab of Banda. In his absence all these stories were
created and circulated and the Bakhars edited to remove Mastani by Krishna
Sohni.
Comments
Sorry for the delay in replying as I was a bit busy with other commitments. Hope you will forgive me.
About the Kashibai - Mastani interaction, let us just remember that Kashibai had grown up from childhood, playing with her husband Bajirao and never dreamt that he would one day bring in such a stunning beauty into their lives, whose dowry was to become the life blood of the Peshwai to boot!
Obviously she would try to keep herself unto the mark to maintain her position as Mrs. Bajirao. Unfortunately for her, Mastani was not only as well trained as her, but also beautiful and intelligent too. That gave her an edge that Kashibai tried to gain with her early association since childhood. Let us also remember that between 1731 when the family shifted into the Shanivar Wada at Pune and till Bajirao's death in 1740, Mastani bore him only one son, Krishnasinh in January 1734, and Kashibai 4, of whom only two survived, both born after Krishnasinh.
Obviously in a large political household, there would many lips whispering many things into very many ears, which would bear influence on minds, especially one threatened by the fear that the Peshwai might slip out of her son's grasp into that of his half brother who was the Zerox of Bajirao himself, Mastani's son, renamed Shamsher Bahadur.
A dance face-off between Kashibai and Mastani was not likely to happen as Kashibai had, after a long earlier illness, developed a slight limp.
Regarding the matrugaman episode, you will find it referred to in very many renderings of Bajirao's life, both historical and social. Since Mastani's name was edited out of the Bakhars around 1800, there is not historical material as such, so the focus shifts to what are called secondary sources, books written in that period of later by different persons, diaries, commentaries etc etc.
Just as the conservative historians accepted the dancing girl myth after the editing of the Bakhar, they also agreed to depict not he matrugaman episode as an instance of Nana Saheb's total nubile and naive reliance on the machinations of his uncle Chimaji appa, in order to discredit Mastani in the eyes of Bajirao.
My observation is that Nana was neither nubile nor naive. He had been unto lot of stunts earlier too. He was a grown up, as old as Mastani was, @25 years old, whose wife's Godh Bharai for their first child had just been held then. Even if the suggestion came from someone else, is it not incumbent for the person to reflect on what they are doing, when and especially in the light of family relations -- more so in an important political sphere like the honor of the Peshwai itself?
Kusum Choppra
Personally I think one needs to be rational in accepting healthy practices and weeding out others that cause unnecessary family heartburn as we move forward in time. That is the practice in more communities in India and around the world, than you and I can keep track off.
Since the present head of the Peshwa family has accepted Mastani as his legally wedded wife, (such as may be the legalities of marriage in those times), I think this controversy in unnecessary. You are welcome to meet me for a discussion, but the matter is closed here.
Kusum Choppra.
All the best. Hope we meet someday.