Pre-caste Indian society
Were the people of
the Harappan Civilization (HC) Dravidians or Indo-Aryans? Archeologists and
scholars are divided over conclusions from the study of the bones and skulls found
at various Harappan civilization (HC) sites that extend over western and northwestern
India and adjoining areas in Pakistan.
Questions
surround the political status of the HC. The concept of a ‘state’ is generally
accepted to have a centralized economy and leadership, with a hierarchically ranked
social system. But the HC covered a
large degree of regional diversity. Evidences of a single state concept are
usually palaces, temples and differentiated burial sites – All absent in the HC
sites, pointing to city-states surrounded by rural hinterlands. Exchange was the
key to social organization, given booming, surprisingly well-organized trade
with other countries.
One
2008 study mapped the movement of raw materials to Harappa; that would be
converted into items of popular use, such as jewelry etc., among the top
exports from the ports. The jury is still out on the HC’ long history of food production and
trade; the corollary may be that it triggered off urbanization as large
quantities of food and other crops for exchange were produced. That led to climate change. But, reasons for such
regional changes are usually more complex.
The people were divided into 4
classes: the learned classes of priests,
physicians, astrologers etc. Recovery of swords from what appear to be
watchmen’s quarters and ancient fort walls, point to the warrior class to
protect the people. Artisans and traders
formed a third class of commercial persons, carpenters, weaver, goldsmiths, shell workers, engravers etc., followed by manual
labor and working class folk.
This division later transformed
into the Vedic caste system of India, with Brahmins, Kshtriyas, Vaisyas and
Shudras, that evolves even today. Before it solidified, caste underwent
dramatic changes, with each influx of emigrants over the Himalayas. They came, saw
and conquered --- only to submerge themselves in the larger Indian populaces. Today
it would be hard to configure original bloodlines.
Four castes grew to literally
thousands of castes and sub castes. How
could that happen in a solidified system? Shows that despite khap panchayats
and honor killings, inter caste marriage and profession based castes are as old
as the hills. Even Rishis married into different castes, didn’t they?
A very today example of how
castes multiply: a Sindhi who married a Punjabi. The children called themselves
Panglo-Sindhi. The eldest married a man
with Sindhi-Parsi parents. What are
their children? One son married a
Kashmiri and another a young woman of Gujarati-Sindhi parentage. How many new combinations does that create?
Ironically, caste that later drew
so much derision from European writers was replicated in Europe in Feudal
times. Kings represented gods, kept priests
and warriors squabbling, both inter and intra, with the 3rd and 4th
classes of trade guilds and serfs. A
casual study of European history would mean a lot of laughs at those historians
Comments